Part of the problem in answering lies in the fact that mortgages generally run for 20 years
or longer – and that is a long time. And during that period many different economic
environments can exist. For example, interest rates can be high , or low. In SA rates are at
record lows. Two years from now, it could all be different. Other external factors could
come into play such as cashflow needs.
Here are a few thoughts to bear in mind if you are either paying off or considering paying
off your mortgage at a faster rate than required – or, perhaps even considering paying off
the balance completely.
In the present situation we find ourselves in , people will tend to focus on the short term.
And because a mortgage is a long-term commitment we should not forget to look at the big
picture.
A fear is that inflation will suddenly revive, and this fear has been there , mostly unnoticed
since the Global Financial Market crash in 2008/ 2009. That said , SA’s inflation is currently
low - and it seems that the likelihood of a long slow recovery is not pointing towards
inflation increasing suddenly.
BUT , if we head into a period of low economic activity – and it folds into a depression –
where asset prices start to fall- then I think the question I need to ask myself is – what is
the upside for me if I repay my house mortgage faster? In a climate of declining prices I will
be aware that I am probably concentrating risk – and also its more likely that my house will
sell for less in a depression?
It might help to restating some points regarding this :
1. What you save when you repay your mortgage “faster” is always the interest rate you are
paying - say, 8%
NOW, that sort of return is not a bad investment when things are “normal”. But, firstly,
interest rates are at historic lows, so, what I will earn will be less and less…. As rates stay low
– or decline further?
2. I have to ask where I am as regards the bond’s term – at the beginning or near the end –
more interest is payable in the former case? IF at the end I save less interest!
3. If I am increasing my equity in my house – the only way I get that money back is when I
sell the house - which is okay – but then the question will be – at what rate will my house
price grow – and what happens if my house price – goes down - it declines in price? I will end
up owning 100% of an asset that has declined in value. Oops.
4. So given the present uncertainty an interim step might be to stick to the minimum for the
present or a little above that?
Adopting that approach contributes to the following advantages :
a) I get to keep the cash I am no longer putting into the bond capital reduction. Keeping
Powder dry stuff.
b) If things turn out differently – I have the cash which I can repay into the bond – and I am
no worse off.
c) If things turn out to be less attractive and house prices decline then I have shielded – not
saved myself to some extent from the problem above - simply by not having all my eggs in
one basket?
.
My general advice would be -think around the above……and perhaps keep your cashflow –
intact and pay less for the present?
BUT here is what I have to immediately add in . Not everyone is the same -and circumstances could
dictate a different approach. Getting personal advice on this is a good start – because any action
you take should fit your circumstances.
Archenfield usually charges for time spent – and bills on an hourly basis. The first meeting – which is at no cost to clients – is where the scope of the work needing to be done is assessed.